Technology as a Pre-requisite Skill?
We recently hired a new secretary. We required the all applicants to take the advanced assessment for Microsoft Office Excel, Word and Outlook. We do this because from experience we have learned that our office is too busy for people to learn on the job. They need to enter the job with a high degree of competency. We offer a personal interview only to the candidates that demonstrate they are tech savvy.
This led me to pondering whether or not the same is true for new teachers. Is the classroom just too busy of a place to learn on the job? Should teachers enter the classroom with a high degree of technology competency. Should we assess technology skills in a systematic way in the same vein we look at pedagogy and communication skills?
If the answer is no, how much further into the 21st century before we might consider technology assessment as a necessity?
If the answer is yes, what technology skills would we assess and how would we assess them?
Comments
What school's belief statements do not include the phrase "life-long learning" or something similar? Can one truly be a life-long learner in the information age without strong tech skills?
What should we assess? How about the National Education Technology Standards for Teachers - ISTE's NETS-T.
Download NETS-T
As good teachers we should certainly know how to assess standards.
While I agree that a lack of technology proficiency would not necessarily eliminate an otherwise strong candidate, it is another yardstick to be used in finding the best candidate.
Good thought provoking questions!
Seriously, I work the most frequently with teachers that already have a high level of technology skills.
I also feel that many of our colleges are doing an inadequacy job of training teachers in technology. I have run into College Professors training their students to be prepared for 1994(or much earlier) not 2009 and beyond.