Planning for Differentiation

An article in the Washington Post, Schools Look At Providing More Time For Teachers caught my eye recently which looks at teacher planning time. As you might imagine, teachers feel they lack planning time.... and they may have a point. The amount of planning time has stayed constant while requirements for inclusion and accountability have increased.

My question is do we design curriculum to address these challenges from the onset or do we expect teachers to plan lessons, adjust their instruction for a variety of diverse learners, grade assignments, connect with parents and other colleagues, make copies in a 40 minute planning period? Curriculum Planning Pyramid

Why not differentiate the curriculum from the beginning?

The graphic to the left depicts the Curriculum Planning Pyramid (Schumm, Vaughn, & Leavell, 1994) which represents how curriculum might be organized to meet the needs of all learners.

  • The base represents the most important concepts you want ALL STUDENTS to learn.
  • The middle layer represents additional facts, extensions of base concepts, related concepts that MOST, but not all students will learn.
  • The top represents complex and/or detailed information that a FEW students learn.

It's the same content, but different attainments. This coupled with "Big Ideas" differentiates the curriculum from the onset. Priorities are already established. Teachers will have a pre-established guide to help communicate expectations to parents, write IEPs, and work with other colleagues.

In a previous life, I was a teacher of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. I had many regular education teachers I had to work with to serve my students and while I tried to help, I often wondered what the point of helping students complete a single worksheet or assignment. Teachers rarely had time to collaborate. I am intrigued by the idea of how much more effective our work might have been if I had such a curriculum to guide my efforts. What are your thoughts?

Schumm, J.S., Vaughn, S., & Leavell, A.G. (1994). Planning pyramid: A framework for planning for diverse student needs during content area instruction. The Reading Teacher, 47, pp.608-615.

Vaughn, S., Bos, C.S., & Schumm, J.S. (2000). Teaching exceptional, diverse, and at-risk students in the general education classroom. (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Comments

Michelle D. Davis said…
During my time as a special ed resource and inclusion teacher, time for planning and collaboration was often limited and usually after school. When I was able to get together with my grade level teachers, we were able to do some great work. All teachers are struggling with time and see differentiation as another add on when it truly should be more. I think the idea of a planned curriculum guide that provides the different attainment levels for teachers helps to eliminate some of the pre-planning for them and will serve as a framework for lessons. It may also help them to develop their own differentiated lessons within the content. The ultimate would combine the differentiated curriculum guide with ample planning and collaboration time! (Got a magic wand?)
January 3, 2009 at 6:49 PM
Isabel Quayle said…
I worked for almost 30 years as a special ed. teacher and then retired hoping never to return. During COVID I babysat my grandchildren and realized that I should help out because I know how cruel the world can be when you have a learning disability or just learning problems. I had always tried to get my students up to date with regular class work so they could feel like a part of everything.
Now after COVID things are so far behind that the regular classes can't keep up with the program. Plus there's not enough teachers/staff to go around.
June 21, 2023 at 8:49 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Libraries as the Hub of School Improvement

Image
I love school improvement! It sounds geeky and surreal, but it’s true. I practically get goose bumps talking about continuous improvement and high leverage instructional strategies. We have worked hard at our IU to offer comprehensive services to support our school districts and truly thought we had most of the territory covered. However, turns out we never considered the role of school libraries as a source of school improvement. Summary of Research Concludes (Findings from 19 State and 1 Province including Pennsylvania) : “A substantial body of research since 1990 shows a positive relationship between school libraries and student achievement. The research studies show that school libraries can have a positive impact on student achievement—whether such achievement is measured in terms of reading scores, literacy, or learning more generally. A school library program that is adequately staffed, resourced, and funded can lead to higher student achievement regardless of the soc...
Read more

Luau as a Metaphor for School Improvement

Image
The luau, once called the aha aina, was an event that was designed to unite the participants and foster good will, thanks and praise. The purpose of the luau could have been to celebrate accomplishments, honor heroes or gods, or commemorate important events. While some ancient foods represented strength or virility, other foods might symbolize virtues or goals the participants hoped to achieve (from To-Hawaii.com) A luau, in other words, is all about reflection. What is going well? What are the next steps? This is exactly what our school improvement teams did last week. They reflected on the level of implementation of their plan and the level of effectiveness. Participants spent the morning going through their plans goal by goal – looking back toward accomplishments and looking forward to next steps. We over-laid these discussions with information on managing and effectively facilitating change. We read Implications for School Leaders Facilitating Change , which is from H...
Read more