Student Engagement

The issue of student engagement has come up again and again in work with schools as they implement instructional walkthroughs. Student engagement typically comes up in a checklist format as a YES or NO. This has never felt right to me. Fortunately I stumbled upon the work of Phil Schlechty. In Working on the Work (2002) He makes a case for five levels of engagement:

  1. Authentic engagement
  2. Ritual engagement
  3. Passive engagement
  4. Retreatism
  5. Rebellion

Click on the video The Way Things Are, The Way Things Should be to learn about the variation in levels of engagement.

The idea is that there is a huge difference in engagement when kids are copying material off the board or completing a worksheet Vs a hands on science experiment. It’s the students’ reaction to the work and its meaning that is at the heart of the different levels of engagement, the more meaningful the work, the more likely profound learning will take place.

That is not to say there is not a place for passive or ritual engagement. It is impossible to sustain authentic engagement 100% of the time. It’s too taxing. However, the absence authentic engagement should greatly concern us.

Stay tuned – I will share how we are applying Schlechty’s work to our instructional walkthrough process – getting beyond a yes/no.

 “What we need are schools organized in ways that put the joy back into teaching and that do not confuse rigor with rigor mortis.”

Schlechty, P. (2002). Working on the work: An action plan for teachers, principals, and superintendents. Jossey- Bass Education: San Francisco, CA.

Comments

The Bigg Family said…
We were glad to read you are thinking of ways to gather information about student engagement beyond the “yes/no” checklist in your current walkthroughs. At the Schlechty Center, we believe the only true way to measure student engagement is to ask the student. We have a client who is exploring ways to completely change the district’s teacher evaluation system to be more of an assessment process that allows teachers to create a portfolio of designs and conversations with their principal. If you are interested in learning more about this process as it develops, please send an e-mail to Marilyn at mhohmann@schlechtycenter.org or call our office at 502.895.1942.
February 3, 2010 at 2:36 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Controversy Over Cursive

Image
Twenty years ago ---- eek that's how long it has been since I graduated from high school, cursive was a given in the curriculum. Teachers used it, students had to be able to read it and write it. I can remember copying copious notes from the board in cursive. A lot has changed in those two decades. I now reserve cursive for signing checks and other documents. I rarely find I need to read something in cursive, other than perhaps a name. Typing, however, has become an absolute necessity. How important is cursive? With all the content that has been added, not to mention accountability.... how valuable is it? Do we need to spend time as early as third grade on teaching cursive? What do you think? Photo from http://www.flickr.com/photos/ocherdraco/88217480/
Read more

Planning for Differentiation

Image
An article in the Washington Post, Schools Look At Providing More Time For Teachers caught my eye recently which looks at teacher planning time. As you might imagine, teachers feel they lack planning time.... and they may have a point. The amount of planning time has stayed constant while requirements for inclusion and accountability have increased. My question is do we design curriculum to address these challenges from the onset or do we expect teachers to plan lessons, adjust their instruction for a variety of diverse learners, grade assignments, connect with parents and other colleagues, make copies in a 40 minute planning period? Why not differentiate the curriculum from the beginning? The graphic to the left depicts the Curriculum Planning Pyramid (Schumm, Vaughn, & Leavell, 1994) which represents how curriculum might be organized to meet the needs of all learners. The base represents the most important concepts you want ALL STUDENTS to learn. The middle layer represents
Read more

Luau as a Metaphor for School Improvement

Image
The luau, once called the aha aina, was an event that was designed to unite the participants and foster good will, thanks and praise. The purpose of the luau could have been to celebrate accomplishments, honor heroes or gods, or commemorate important events. While some ancient foods represented strength or virility, other foods might symbolize virtues or goals the participants hoped to achieve (from To-Hawaii.com) A luau, in other words, is all about reflection. What is going well? What are the next steps? This is exactly what our school improvement teams did last week. They reflected on the level of implementation of their plan and the level of effectiveness. Participants spent the morning going through their plans goal by goal – looking back toward accomplishments and looking forward to next steps. We over-laid these discussions with information on managing and effectively facilitating change. We read Implications for School Leaders Facilitating Change , which is from H
Read more